Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age > 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,722,257 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 62.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.054% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age > 16

In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Kiowa (62.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Arapaho (62.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Yakama (62.1%, a difference of 0.25%), American (62.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and Ottawa (62.0%, a difference of 0.44%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age > 16
Blackfeet	0.0 /100 \| #311	Tragic 63.2%
Iroquois	0.0 /100 \| #312	Tragic 63.2%
Chippewa	0.0 /100 \| #313	Tragic 63.1%
Yaqui	0.0 /100 \| #314	Tragic 63.0%
Potawatomi	0.0 /100 \| #315	Tragic 62.8%
Yup'ik	0.0 /100 \| #316	Tragic 62.7%
Kiowa	0.0 /100 \| #317	Tragic 62.4%
Chickasaw	0.0 /100 \| #318	Tragic 62.3%
Arapaho	0.0 /100 \| #319	Tragic 62.1%
Yakama	0.0 /100 \| #320	Tragic 62.1%
Americans	0.0 /100 \| #321	Tragic 62.1%
Ottawa	0.0 /100 \| #322	Tragic 62.0%
Seminole	0.0 /100 \| #323	Tragic 62.0%
Cheyenne	0.0 /100 \| #324	Tragic 62.0%
Cherokee	0.0 /100 \| #325	Tragic 61.9%

Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chickasaw Data	In Labor Force \| Age > 16 Data
Minimum	0.032%	28.7%
Maximum	36.8%	76.1%
Range	36.8%	47.4%
Mean	8.8%	55.2%
Median	7.5%	56.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.6%	50.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	12.0%	61.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.4%	10.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.9%	8.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.9%	8.8%

Correlation Details

Chickasaw Percentile	Sample Size	In Labor Force \| Age > 16
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032%	136,672,645	65.7%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25%	5,307,023	63.1%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45%	1,606,572	62.3%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60%	1,614,409	64.0%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83%	826,043	62.4%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99%	475,295	62.8%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19%	233,583	59.1%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35%	249,739	60.7%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54%	89,231	57.8%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74%	88,765	61.7%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93%	53,323	55.9%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13%	48,029	49.9%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28%	55,156	57.4%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51%	15,979	54.4%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66%	16,025	53.7%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88%	67,875	56.6%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00%	18,539	52.3%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24%	16,118	47.7%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46%	7,995	60.0%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.58%	7,909	60.2%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83%	1,750	49.2%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93%	2,773	57.1%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14%	4,957	58.7%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35%	20,308	52.6%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53%	26,620	59.0%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.70%	4,529	56.5%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.86%	2,552	53.2%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10%	4,663	58.1%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18%	40,906	60.0%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.57%	4,596	50.3%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.86%	290	37.4%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 6.00%	4,318	50.9%
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.17%	665	46.4%
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36%	6,967	51.2%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.51%	215	34.0%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65%	1,234	43.5%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.95%	4,633	55.2%
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04%	1,108	59.0%
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28%	8,632	49.7%
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.45%	2,925	50.9%
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.56%	6,148	51.0%
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88%	2,449	63.7%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.00%	350	61.2%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21%	633	50.5%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29%	4,329	64.3%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.60%	651	67.1%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81%	919	56.6%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.93%	1,803	52.6%
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11%	966	54.1%
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44%	4,841	58.8%
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.69%	351	44.9%
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.00%	7,518	62.0%
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.49%	286	70.3%
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75%	930	50.4%
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95%	5,491	58.1%
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15%	1,283	55.3%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.54%	208	68.4%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.68%	1,516	66.7%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85%	16,629	59.7%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.98%	31,368	61.1%
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37%	897	54.0%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.13%	8,460	51.6%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31%	3,110	41.3%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.45%	119	60.0%
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.64%	560	51.7%
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.00%	40	32.5%
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30%	791	54.3%
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.93%	841	43.9%
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55%	145	36.2%
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79%	262	48.6%
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.29%	82	70.0%
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.46%	428	61.1%
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.31%	64	39.7%
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.05%	114	28.7%
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23%	212	55.2%
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.86%	988	64.2%
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.81%	189	54.4%
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.74%	1,286	64.1%
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.79%	106	76.1%

Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age > 16

COMPARE

Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age > 16 Tragic

Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age > 16

Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary

Correlation Details

Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic