Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 20-64

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,722,293 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269 and weighted average of 76.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.41% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 due to other factors.

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 20-64

In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Cherokee (76.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Inupiat (76.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Yaqui (76.5%, a difference of 0.44%), Yakama (75.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and Ottawa (76.7%, a difference of 0.63%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 20-64
Blackfeet	0.0 /100 \| #311	Tragic 77.0%
Alaskan Athabascans	0.0 /100 \| #312	Tragic 76.9%
Shoshone	0.0 /100 \| #313	Tragic 76.8%
Blacks/African Americans	0.0 /100 \| #314	Tragic 76.8%
Ottawa	0.0 /100 \| #315	Tragic 76.7%
Yaqui	0.0 /100 \| #316	Tragic 76.5%
Cherokee	0.0 /100 \| #317	Tragic 76.2%
Chickasaw	0.0 /100 \| #318	Tragic 76.2%
Inupiat	0.0 /100 \| #319	Tragic 76.1%
Yakama	0.0 /100 \| #320	Tragic 75.8%
Seminole	0.0 /100 \| #321	Tragic 75.5%
Dutch West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #322	Tragic 75.5%
Cajuns	0.0 /100 \| #323	Tragic 75.5%
Choctaw	0.0 /100 \| #324	Tragic 75.4%
Menominee	0.0 /100 \| #325	Tragic 75.3%

Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chickasaw Data	In Labor Force \| Age 20-64 Data
Minimum	0.032%	38.5%
Maximum	25.7%	87.5%
Range	25.7%	49.0%
Mean	8.6%	69.2%
Median	7.5%	70.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.6%	65.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	12.0%	75.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.4%	10.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.2%	9.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.2%	9.4%

Correlation Details

Chickasaw Percentile	Sample Size	In Labor Force \| Age 20-64
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032%	136,672,645	79.1%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25%	5,307,023	77.3%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45%	1,606,572	76.5%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60%	1,614,409	77.2%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83%	826,043	76.6%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99%	475,295	76.2%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19%	233,583	73.4%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35%	249,739	73.5%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54%	89,231	70.8%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74%	88,765	76.0%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93%	53,323	72.1%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13%	48,029	64.6%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28%	55,156	73.0%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51%	15,979	68.8%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66%	16,025	70.5%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88%	67,875	72.0%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00%	18,539	68.1%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24%	16,118	63.9%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46%	7,995	75.1%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.58%	7,909	74.8%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83%	1,750	64.8%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93%	2,773	67.9%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14%	4,957	73.9%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35%	20,308	69.1%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53%	26,620	73.0%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.70%	4,529	70.1%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.86%	2,552	64.4%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10%	4,663	78.1%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18%	40,906	74.0%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.57%	4,596	69.8%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.86%	290	52.9%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 6.00%	4,318	67.4%
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.16%	617	61.7%
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36%	6,967	70.3%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.51%	215	51.2%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65%	1,234	54.2%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.95%	4,633	71.4%
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04%	1,108	79.5%
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28%	8,632	67.2%
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.45%	2,925	62.4%
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.56%	6,148	67.8%
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88%	2,449	77.8%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.00%	350	66.7%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21%	633	66.5%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29%	4,329	78.9%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.60%	651	84.0%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81%	919	70.0%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.93%	1,803	80.5%
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11%	966	67.2%
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44%	4,841	74.0%
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.69%	351	56.3%
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.00%	7,518	76.0%
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.49%	286	82.2%
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75%	930	71.2%
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95%	5,491	71.9%
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15%	1,283	72.3%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.54%	208	70.5%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.68%	1,516	82.4%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85%	16,629	72.9%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.98%	31,368	76.0%
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37%	897	65.8%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.13%	8,460	65.2%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31%	3,110	57.2%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.45%	119	70.3%
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.64%	560	62.7%
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.00%	40	40.9%
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30%	791	75.9%
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.79%	190	39.5%
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.93%	841	54.8%
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55%	145	55.3%
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79%	262	70.5%
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.29%	82	87.5%
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.46%	428	71.4%
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.31%	64	57.6%
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.05%	114	38.5%
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23%	212	67.5%
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.86%	988	78.4%
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.81%	189	66.0%
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.74%	1,286	74.2%

Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 20-64

COMPARE

Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 20-64Tragic

Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 20-64

Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary

Correlation Details

Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic