Chickasaw vs Alsatian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Alsatian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Alsatians
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
220th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Alsatian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,678,421 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.286 and weighted average of 14.5%, a difference of 9.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Alsatian |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 38.6% | 23.1% |
| Range | 36.7% | 19.7% |
| Mean | 18.1% | 11.5% |
| Median | 17.3% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.6% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 4.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Demographics Similar to Alsatians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Cambodia (14.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Nonimmigrants (14.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |