Chickasaw vs South American Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
South American
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
South Americans
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
44.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
180th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs South American Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,491,329 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 17.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | South American |
Minimum | 1.9% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 38.6% | 25.0% |
Range | 36.7% | 21.0% |
Mean | 18.1% | 13.3% |
Median | 17.3% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.6% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 15.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 3.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Demographics Similar to South Americans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Venezuelan (13.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Colombia (13.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Kenyan (13.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (13.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (13.5%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 48.8 /100 | #179 | Average 13.5% |
South Americans | 44.8 /100 | #180 | Average 13.5% |
Venezuelans | 44.5 /100 | #181 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 44.5 /100 | #182 | Average 13.5% |
Kenyans | 43.8 /100 | #183 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 43.2 /100 | #184 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 42.0 /100 | #185 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 41.5 /100 | #186 | Average 13.6% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 41.0 /100 | #187 | Average 13.6% |