Native Hawaiian Female Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,828,170 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359 and weighted average of 12.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.098% in poverty level among females.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Native Hawaiians and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Native Hawaiians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Native Hawaiians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.

Demographics Similar to Native Hawaiians by Female Poverty

In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty
Belgians	95.8 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 12.4%
Czechoslovakians	95.7 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 12.4%
Immigrants from Egypt	95.5 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 12.5%
Immigrants from Indonesia	95.4 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 12.5%
Immigrants from South Africa	95.4 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 12.5%
British	95.2 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 12.5%
Australians	95.2 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 12.5%
Native Hawaiians	95.1 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 12.5%
Romanians	95.1 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 12.5%
Immigrants from Latvia	94.8 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 12.5%
Tlingit-Haida	94.8 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 12.5%
Immigrants from China	94.5 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 12.5%
Slavs	94.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 12.5%
Palestinians	94.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 12.5%
Scottish	94.1 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 12.5%

Native Hawaiian Female Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Native Hawaiian Data	Female Poverty Data
Minimum	0.13%	2.1%
Maximum	92.3%	30.4%
Range	92.1%	28.2%
Mean	31.5%	12.6%
Median	28.4%	11.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	14.3%	8.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	44.6%	15.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	30.3%	7.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	21.1%	5.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	21.0%	5.8%

Correlation Details

Native Hawaiian Percentile	Sample Size	Female Poverty
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13%	300,183,044	14.7%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.69%	22,035,886	12.0%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17%	4,402,176	12.1%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66%	1,437,814	10.9%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.21%	550,176	12.5%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.65%	156,127	11.4%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20%	63,533	15.1%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70%	38,602	9.1%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.25%	49,517	13.7%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.72%	49,404	10.9%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.21%	26,511	11.9%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.61%	11,989	11.9%
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.33%	5,797	8.8%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.84%	30,078	12.5%
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.18%	5,976	17.0%
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81%	12,778	11.8%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.34%	66,750	8.1%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.92%	6,325	24.3%
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.19%	3,669	11.4%
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.61%	31,825	12.8%
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.30%	16,692	2.5%
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.72%	19,843	8.9%
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.30%	1,018	11.8%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.79%	1,680	2.1%
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.39%	464,382	12.1%
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.81%	52,995	7.6%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.39%	102,236	13.5%
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.86%	101,564	9.3%
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.35%	103,149	5.7%
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.67%	128,020	9.5%
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.42%	6,419	9.5%
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.77%	28,431	9.5%
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.25%	163,685	6.2%
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.62%	28,537	11.7%
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.14%	51,321	6.5%
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.74%	58,669	8.5%
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.33%	4,996	6.6%
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.85%	117,714	9.3%
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.11%	71,880	5.8%
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.85%	35,103	5.4%
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.36%	97,208	8.1%
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.86%	28,982	4.9%
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.22%	21,055	8.2%
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.64%	15,015	13.9%
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.35%	13,335	8.2%
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.88%	43,434	6.6%
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.43%	3,073	26.2%
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.83%	54,915	9.3%
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.16%	7,050	12.6%
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.68%	36,062	15.6%
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.19%	2,211	6.9%
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.72%	13,666	10.6%
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.30%	2,255	9.8%
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.78%	26,147	11.0%
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.32%	63,950	9.6%
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.81%	9,568	5.9%
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.13%	49,623	8.7%
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.68%	38,553	6.7%
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.29%	7,767	17.4%
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.68%	66,780	6.5%
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.35%	3,532	4.8%
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.63%	3,542	12.9%
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.44%	4,628	12.1%
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.62%	7,704	7.7%
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.34%	3,145	20.0%
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.52%	3,484	13.6%
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.76%	55,269	8.9%
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.33%	6,216	7.4%
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.69%	1,897	7.7%
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.26%	27,351	16.0%
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.92%	27,766	8.1%
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.35%	2,421	10.5%
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.28%	5,638	13.1%
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.79%	2,625	24.0%
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.18%	11,149	5.0%
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.95%	50,453	14.9%
[ 39.5% - 40.0% ] 39.66%	49,256	15.2%
[ 40.0% - 40.5% ] 40.13%	1,834	6.3%
[ 41.0% - 41.5% ] 41.50%	547	13.0%
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.66%	1,781	13.3%
[ 42.0% - 42.5% ] 42.22%	15,863	14.7%
[ 42.5% - 43.0% ] 42.99%	4,555	14.3%
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.05%	11,029	9.1%
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.78%	4,429	11.9%
[ 44.0% - 44.5% ] 44.27%	3,587	30.4%
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.65%	4,065	28.3%
[ 45.0% - 45.5% ] 45.29%	10,042	25.2%
[ 45.5% - 46.0% ] 45.76%	17,696	18.9%
[ 46.0% - 46.5% ] 46.26%	1,096	19.1%
[ 46.5% - 47.0% ] 46.76%	3,593	13.1%
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.53%	5,026	16.6%
[ 49.5% - 50.0% ] 49.55%	890	18.5%
[ 50.0% - 50.5% ] 50.39%	3,832	25.4%
[ 51.5% - 52.0% ] 51.81%	4,366	22.2%
[ 53.0% - 53.5% ] 53.45%	3,686	17.0%
[ 54.5% - 55.0% ] 54.72%	3,149	17.7%
[ 57.0% - 57.5% ] 57.46%	731	28.6%
[ 59.0% - 59.5% ] 59.23%	130	7.0%
[ 59.5% - 60.0% ] 59.72%	17,857	15.7%
[ 60.0% - 60.5% ] 60.21%	480	6.9%
[ 60.5% - 61.0% ] 60.59%	51,367	19.8%
[ 62.5% - 63.0% ] 62.57%	2,872	10.6%
[ 63.0% - 63.5% ] 63.35%	4,827	21.1%
[ 63.5% - 64.0% ] 63.68%	14,129	19.3%
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.30%	902	21.6%
[ 64.5% - 65.0% ] 64.76%	210	16.7%
[ 65.5% - 66.0% ] 65.97%	3,553	18.5%
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.63%	10,307	8.6%
[ 70.0% - 70.5% ] 70.09%	3,133	10.8%
[ 73.5% - 74.0% ] 73.53%	12,370	16.8%
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.96%	2,853	12.0%
[ 78.0% - 78.5% ] 78.49%	2,436	14.5%
[ 78.5% - 79.0% ] 78.97%	4,475	6.9%
[ 92.0% - 92.5% ] 92.27%	1,436	19.4%

Native Hawaiian Female Poverty

COMPARE

Native Hawaiian Female PovertyExceptional

Native Hawaiian Female Poverty Correlation Chart

Demographics Similar to Native Hawaiians by Female Poverty

Native Hawaiian Female Poverty Correlation Summary

Correlation Details

Native Hawaiian Female Poverty
Exceptional