Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Select to Compare
Ambulatory Disability
Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability
8.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,679,473 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304 and weighted average of 8.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.25% in percentage of population with ambulatory disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and percentage of population with ambulatory disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with ambulatory disability within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with ambulatory disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Yuman (7.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 1.7%), Cherokee (7.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.7% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw Data | Ambulatory Disability Data |
| Minimum | 0.032% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 36.8% | 29.7% |
| Range | 36.8% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 8.9% | 12.1% |
| Median | 7.5% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 5.6% |
Correlation Details
| Chickasaw Percentile | Sample Size | Ambulatory Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032% | 136,650,667 | 6.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 5,292,605 | 6.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 1,604,328 | 7.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 1,614,409 | 8.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 822,648 | 8.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99% | 474,840 | 8.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 233,583 | 10.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 249,739 | 9.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 89,231 | 10.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 88,765 | 8.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 53,323 | 11.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 48,029 | 11.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 55,156 | 8.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 15,979 | 11.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66% | 16,025 | 8.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 67,875 | 10.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 18,539 | 12.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 16,118 | 12.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 7,995 | 12.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.58% | 7,909 | 8.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 1,750 | 15.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 2,773 | 13.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 4,957 | 9.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 20,308 | 14.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 26,620 | 11.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.70% | 4,529 | 11.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.86% | 2,469 | 11.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 4,663 | 11.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 40,906 | 11.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.57% | 4,596 | 12.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.86% | 290 | 27.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 6.00% | 4,318 | 10.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.17% | 486 | 21.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 6,967 | 13.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.51% | 215 | 10.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65% | 1,234 | 13.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.95% | 4,633 | 9.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 1,108 | 6.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 8,632 | 14.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.45% | 2,925 | 8.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.56% | 6,148 | 11.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 2,449 | 6.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.00% | 350 | 4.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 633 | 18.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29% | 4,329 | 13.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.61% | 604 | 1.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 919 | 14.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.93% | 1,803 | 11.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11% | 966 | 16.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 4,841 | 11.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.70% | 268 | 13.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.00% | 7,518 | 10.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.49% | 286 | 9.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75% | 930 | 13.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 5,491 | 10.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15% | 1,283 | 13.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.54% | 208 | 10.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.68% | 1,516 | 7.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85% | 16,537 | 8.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.98% | 31,368 | 8.2% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37% | 897 | 11.6% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.13% | 8,460 | 13.7% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31% | 3,110 | 16.2% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.45% | 119 | 10.6% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.64% | 560 | 18.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.00% | 40 | 5.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30% | 791 | 24.5% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.79% | 190 | 5.7% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.93% | 841 | 19.5% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55% | 145 | 29.7% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79% | 262 | 29.4% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.29% | 82 | 3.7% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.46% | 428 | 9.8% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.31% | 64 | 25.4% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.05% | 114 | 22.9% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23% | 212 | 11.8% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.86% | 988 | 6.6% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.81% | 189 | 12.2% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.74% | 1,286 | 4.1% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.79% | 106 | 22.6% |