Scandinavian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Scandinavian
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Scandinavian Female Poverty
12.1%
POVERTY | FEMALES
98.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scandinavian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,075,178 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.611 and weighted average of 12.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scandinavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.91% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Scandinavians and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Scandinavians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Scandinavians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Scandinavians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Immigrants from Europe (12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Serbia (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Estonian (12.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Asia (12.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants from Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants from Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants from Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants from Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants from Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants from Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants from Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants from Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants from Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Scandinavian Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scandinavian Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.19% | 3.9% |
| Maximum | 51.4% | 75.0% |
| Range | 51.2% | 71.1% |
| Mean | 15.0% | 18.4% |
| Median | 13.5% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 10.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.9% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 16.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.9% | 16.2% |
Correlation Details
| Scandinavian Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 375,529,751 | 14.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 60,031,483 | 11.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 18,895,702 | 11.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 8,409,112 | 10.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.21% | 4,751,352 | 10.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 2,326,237 | 8.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.21% | 881,882 | 10.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.72% | 482,146 | 8.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24% | 191,100 | 11.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.74% | 117,570 | 11.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.25% | 95,851 | 10.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.74% | 109,449 | 10.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.28% | 49,370 | 9.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.76% | 56,281 | 10.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.29% | 31,712 | 11.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.71% | 22,663 | 10.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.24% | 17,413 | 10.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.71% | 14,529 | 10.9% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.22% | 6,466 | 10.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.75% | 4,913 | 14.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.25% | 12,790 | 7.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.72% | 5,539 | 9.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.24% | 694 | 34.9% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.64% | 1,503 | 17.3% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.24% | 3,373 | 14.0% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.72% | 1,360 | 22.4% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.20% | 553 | 6.9% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.70% | 1,080 | 13.2% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.13% | 4,318 | 11.6% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.56% | 4,444 | 16.4% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.38% | 741 | 15.9% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.75% | 1,111 | 7.5% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.19% | 105 | 9.1% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.60% | 3,820 | 21.8% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.24% | 2,100 | 8.6% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.22% | 1,663 | 14.5% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.75% | 96 | 15.5% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.33% | 119 | 69.4% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.75% | 238 | 8.8% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.05% | 778 | 15.9% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.67% | 150 | 3.9% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.37% | 234 | 20.4% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.81% | 1,412 | 18.0% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.02% | 168 | 32.4% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.78% | 259 | 33.4% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.32% | 37 | 23.5% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.81% | 31 | 64.7% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.09% | 46 | 25.0% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.37% | 95 | 17.6% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.03% | 603 | 4.3% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.11% | 492 | 57.8% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.10% | 156 | 5.6% |
[ 47.0% - 47.5% ] 47.06% | 51 | 54.5% |
[ 51.0% - 51.5% ] 51.35% | 37 | 75.0% |