Chickasaw Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Select to Compare
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Chickasaw Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
17.0%
POVERTY | FEMALES 25-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
306th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,041,279 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.258 and weighted average of 17.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.47% in poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Yaqui (17.0%, a difference of 0.020%), African (17.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Ottawa (17.1%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (16.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and Honduran (16.9%, a difference of 0.75%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.7% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Immigrants from Congo | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants from Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants from Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.2% |
| Immigrants from Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.5% |
Chickasaw Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw Data | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Data |
| Minimum | 0.032% | 3.5% |
| Maximum | 25.7% | 60.0% |
| Range | 25.7% | 56.5% |
| Mean | 7.3% | 21.5% |
| Median | 6.4% | 19.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 15.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.9% | 24.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 9.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 9.7% |
Correlation Details
| Chickasaw Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032% | 136,367,546 | 14.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 5,155,320 | 14.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 1,527,468 | 16.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 1,583,358 | 18.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 808,410 | 18.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 446,961 | 15.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 226,476 | 20.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 240,701 | 18.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 79,592 | 18.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 85,609 | 22.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 50,852 | 17.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 38,955 | 25.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 51,649 | 17.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 15,979 | 20.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 11,816 | 24.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 62,700 | 21.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 18,243 | 21.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 15,996 | 22.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 7,995 | 16.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.58% | 7,909 | 24.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 1,306 | 14.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 2,773 | 17.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.13% | 4,862 | 19.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 20,308 | 27.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 26,620 | 20.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.73% | 3,640 | 23.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.85% | 1,773 | 19.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.11% | 4,074 | 19.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 40,253 | 17.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.56% | 4,225 | 19.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.99% | 3,720 | 33.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.16% | 438 | 5.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 6,967 | 15.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.97% | 3,573 | 14.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 668 | 30.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 8,480 | 12.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.46% | 2,735 | 21.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.56% | 6,148 | 13.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 2,449 | 23.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.00% | 350 | 28.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 633 | 17.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29% | 4,329 | 22.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 919 | 40.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.94% | 1,085 | 45.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11% | 966 | 9.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 4,841 | 22.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.70% | 268 | 8.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.00% | 7,518 | 29.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75% | 930 | 25.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 4,739 | 22.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15% | 1,283 | 17.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.68% | 1,473 | 3.5% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85% | 16,537 | 18.6% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.98% | 31,368 | 16.2% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37% | 897 | 10.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.12% | 7,470 | 37.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31% | 3,110 | 41.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.45% | 119 | 33.3% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.64% | 560 | 11.5% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30% | 791 | 12.5% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.98% | 488 | 13.6% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79% | 262 | 41.7% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.29% | 82 | 60.0% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.46% | 428 | 33.3% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.74% | 1,286 | 14.4% |