Chickasaw Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Select to Compare
Single Mother Poverty
Chickasaw Single Mother Poverty
34.4%
POVERTY | SINGLE MOTHERS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,526,184 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.321 and weighted average of 34.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.98% in poverty level among single mothers.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and poverty level among single mothers does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single mothers within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single mothers due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hopi (34.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (34.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Dominican (34.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Central American Indian (34.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and Cherokee (34.5%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 33.9% |
| Immigrants from Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 34.0% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 34.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 34.2% |
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 34.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 34.3% |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 34.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 34.4% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 34.5% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 34.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 34.5% |
| Immigrants from Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 34.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 34.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 34.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 35.1% |
Chickasaw Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw Data | Single Mother Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.032% | 21.2% |
| Maximum | 36.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 36.8% | 78.7% |
| Mean | 8.1% | 47.2% |
| Median | 7.0% | 39.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 33.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.5% | 53.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 19.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 20.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 19.8% |
Correlation Details
| Chickasaw Percentile | Sample Size | Single Mother Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032% | 135,940,566 | 31.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 5,115,573 | 31.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 1,519,794 | 34.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 1,555,361 | 38.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 810,617 | 36.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 451,699 | 31.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 223,242 | 40.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 239,607 | 36.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.53% | 76,062 | 38.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 82,719 | 37.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 48,453 | 35.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 38,579 | 41.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 51,687 | 34.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 15,979 | 43.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66% | 10,959 | 51.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 64,331 | 28.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 17,577 | 45.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 14,523 | 50.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 7,995 | 39.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.58% | 7,909 | 56.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 1,306 | 35.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 2,773 | 54.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.13% | 4,862 | 43.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 20,308 | 37.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 26,620 | 38.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.69% | 2,881 | 62.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.85% | 1,773 | 52.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 1,893 | 37.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 40,674 | 39.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.56% | 3,670 | 31.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 6.00% | 3,852 | 56.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.16% | 438 | 36.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 6,967 | 53.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.67% | 450 | 93.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.98% | 3,280 | 42.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.09% | 254 | 50.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 8,480 | 30.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.45% | 2,925 | 26.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.56% | 6,148 | 32.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 2,449 | 30.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 633 | 38.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29% | 4,329 | 21.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 919 | 100.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.89% | 551 | 88.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11% | 966 | 33.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 4,841 | 40.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.70% | 268 | 50.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.00% | 7,518 | 61.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.49% | 286 | 50.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75% | 930 | 72.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 5,491 | 55.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15% | 1,283 | 34.5% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.54% | 208 | 71.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.63% | 43 | 100.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85% | 16,537 | 34.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.98% | 31,368 | 29.1% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37% | 897 | 50.4% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.12% | 7,470 | 52.6% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31% | 3,110 | 50.4% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.45% | 119 | 100.0% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.64% | 560 | 77.8% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30% | 791 | 23.1% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.98% | 488 | 77.8% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79% | 262 | 25.0% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.29% | 82 | 71.4% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.46% | 428 | 28.6% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.31% | 64 | 33.3% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23% | 212 | 33.3% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.81% | 189 | 33.3% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.79% | 106 | 100.0% |