Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 16-19
38.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
97.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,579,210 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.171 and weighted average of 38.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.38% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Nepal (38.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (38.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Colville (38.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Bulgarian (38.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and Ukrainian (38.3%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
| Maltese | 98.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 38.5% |
| Crow | 98.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 38.5% |
| Immigrants from Scotland | 98.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 38.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 98.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 38.4% |
| Hawaiians | 98.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 38.4% |
| Bulgarians | 97.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 38.3% |
| Colville | 97.9 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 38.3% |
| Chickasaw | 97.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 38.3% |
| Immigrants from Nepal | 97.8 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 38.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 97.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 38.3% |
| Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 38.3% |
| Ethiopians | 97.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 38.2% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 97.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 38.2% |
| Seminole | 96.7 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 38.1% |
| Immigrants from England | 96.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 38.1% |
Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw Data | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Data |
| Minimum | 0.032% | 7.1% |
| Maximum | 25.7% | 71.4% |
| Range | 25.7% | 64.3% |
| Mean | 7.6% | 36.5% |
| Median | 6.6% | 37.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 29.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.9% | 42.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 13.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 13.0% |
Correlation Details
| Chickasaw Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032% | 136,641,078 | 36.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 5,264,674 | 40.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 1,593,111 | 42.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 1,603,809 | 41.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 819,299 | 42.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 469,838 | 43.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 232,016 | 41.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 246,488 | 42.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 87,774 | 39.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 78,293 | 42.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 52,838 | 40.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 45,910 | 41.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 53,350 | 30.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 15,979 | 36.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66% | 15,567 | 44.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 67,130 | 38.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 18,243 | 32.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 15,675 | 30.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 7,995 | 31.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.57% | 7,049 | 60.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 1,670 | 61.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 2,672 | 30.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 4,957 | 38.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 20,308 | 39.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 26,620 | 40.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 4,204 | 22.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.86% | 2,078 | 31.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 4,663 | 57.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 40,388 | 42.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.56% | 3,670 | 29.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 6.00% | 4,186 | 21.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.16% | 617 | 51.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 6,967 | 28.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65% | 1,234 | 44.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.95% | 4,633 | 25.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 1,108 | 22.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 8,632 | 30.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.46% | 2,735 | 37.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.56% | 6,148 | 29.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 2,449 | 43.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.00% | 350 | 58.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 633 | 17.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29% | 4,329 | 48.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.61% | 604 | 71.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 919 | 50.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.98% | 323 | 58.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11% | 966 | 15.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 4,841 | 32.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.00% | 7,518 | 37.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75% | 930 | 17.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 5,491 | 31.1% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15% | 1,283 | 13.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.68% | 1,473 | 32.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85% | 16,537 | 29.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.98% | 31,368 | 28.9% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37% | 695 | 7.1% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.12% | 7,470 | 23.2% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31% | 3,110 | 21.8% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.45% | 119 | 50.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.00% | 40 | 40.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30% | 791 | 32.4% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79% | 262 | 20.0% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.46% | 428 | 9.1% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23% | 212 | 41.7% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.86% | 988 | 21.5% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.81% | 189 | 55.6% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.74% | 1,286 | 53.7% |