Immigrants from Jordan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jordan
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Immigrants from Jordan Female Poverty
12.8%
POVERTY | FEMALES
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jordan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,244,945 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414 and weighted average of 12.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.4% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Jordan influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Immigrants from Jordan simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Immigrants from Argentina (12.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (12.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Western Europe (12.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Switzerland (12.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Brazil (12.8%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants from Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
| South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants from Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants from Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants from Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants from Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants from Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants from Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants from Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
| French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Immigrants from France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants from Jordan Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Jordan Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.021% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 7.7% | 64.9% |
| Range | 7.7% | 63.1% |
| Mean | 1.7% | 13.0% |
| Median | 1.3% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.66% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 8.3% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Jordan Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.021% | 83,069,791 | 15.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.057% | 44,505,930 | 14.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.094% | 18,166,904 | 12.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 11,969,970 | 12.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.17% | 6,007,812 | 11.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 3,675,120 | 11.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 2,755,180 | 11.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.29% | 2,191,677 | 11.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 1,221,782 | 8.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 1,138,839 | 10.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.40% | 805,480 | 12.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.44% | 1,243,678 | 15.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.48% | 337,325 | 15.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 469,065 | 10.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 422,672 | 10.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 423,170 | 14.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 360,990 | 11.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.67% | 276,118 | 8.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 160,740 | 9.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 282,201 | 10.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.79% | 167,823 | 12.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 48,630 | 12.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.86% | 110,348 | 12.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.90% | 176,938 | 11.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 85,562 | 7.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 7,782 | 4.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 74,840 | 8.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 14,982 | 7.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 138,607 | 20.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 82,468 | 17.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 52,627 | 7.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 92,277 | 8.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 83,024 | 26.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 64,439 | 11.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 44,281 | 13.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 37,601 | 6.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 54,590 | 10.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44% | 28,464 | 11.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 14,360 | 25.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.56% | 8,220 | 11.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.59% | 36,930 | 13.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 12,525 | 23.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.76% | 16,613 | 8.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 51,537 | 6.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.83% | 25,489 | 6.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 1,221 | 18.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 21,760 | 11.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.97% | 6,496 | 11.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.01% | 14,915 | 9.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.05% | 6,549 | 1.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.18% | 2,160 | 23.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.40% | 8,171 | 5.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.47% | 7,763 | 7.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 13,291 | 12.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 15,452 | 8.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.80% | 9,960 | 13.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.08% | 29,883 | 13.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.14% | 3,317 | 14.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 8,535 | 10.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.26% | 889 | 19.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 7,804 | 10.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.48% | 28,568 | 17.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.60% | 8,919 | 32.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.71% | 2,453 | 3.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.95% | 11,084 | 16.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.03% | 10,859 | 15.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.58% | 1,289 | 2.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.01% | 8,024 | 10.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.69% | 182 | 64.9% |