Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Select to Compare
Single Male Poverty
Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
16.3%
POVERTY | SINGLE MALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.80% in poverty level among single males.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single males within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single males due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw Data | Single Male Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.031% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 23.8% | 67.9% |
| Range | 23.8% | 63.9% |
| Mean | 6.8% | 25.6% |
| Median | 5.6% | 23.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 31.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 12.6% |
Correlation Details
| Chickasaw Percentile | Sample Size | Single Male Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.031% | 130,766,619 | 12.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 4,422,236 | 15.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 1,237,605 | 15.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 1,481,758 | 16.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 756,395 | 19.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 428,462 | 15.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 204,220 | 15.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 210,674 | 15.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.53% | 57,773 | 22.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 73,083 | 20.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.95% | 34,712 | 20.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 27,961 | 26.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 33,425 | 27.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.47% | 7,167 | 35.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 6,044 | 34.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.89% | 56,844 | 24.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 3.00% | 17,405 | 28.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 15,249 | 24.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.48% | 7,133 | 10.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.59% | 1,617 | 18.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 548 | 20.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 2,672 | 21.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.17% | 2,206 | 26.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 20,308 | 8.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.54% | 25,953 | 16.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.70% | 2,428 | 24.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.84% | 1,611 | 11.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.09% | 1,276 | 65.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 40,253 | 14.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 6.00% | 3,585 | 19.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.35% | 5,241 | 26.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.67% | 450 | 30.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.97% | 3,573 | 23.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.00% | 414 | 18.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 8,632 | 17.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.46% | 2,735 | 49.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.56% | 6,148 | 36.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.91% | 2,061 | 42.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29% | 4,329 | 16.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 919 | 6.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.92% | 931 | 67.9% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11% | 966 | 22.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.46% | 2,821 | 19.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.70% | 268 | 50.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.99% | 2,492 | 23.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75% | 930 | 4.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.00% | 1,445 | 35.1% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15% | 1,283 | 31.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85% | 16,537 | 22.6% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.98% | 31,368 | 17.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.12% | 7,470 | 33.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31% | 3,110 | 48.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.45% | 119 | 37.5% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.64% | 560 | 26.7% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30% | 791 | 30.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.98% | 488 | 30.8% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23% | 212 | 33.3% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.81% | 189 | 33.3% |