Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 25-29
81.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,700,460 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 81.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.42% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Comanche (81.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Mexican (81.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Mexico (82.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Seminole (81.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and Colville (81.6%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 82.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 82.3% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 82.2% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 82.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 82.1% |
| Immigrants from Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 82.0% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.9% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 81.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 81.2% |
Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw Data | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Data |
| Minimum | 0.032% | 37.2% |
| Maximum | 25.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 25.7% | 62.8% |
| Mean | 8.1% | 79.6% |
| Median | 7.0% | 79.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 74.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.3% | 88.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 14.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 13.4% |
Correlation Details
| Chickasaw Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032% | 136,672,645 | 84.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 5,305,308 | 82.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 1,603,652 | 81.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 1,612,131 | 82.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 824,973 | 80.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99% | 475,295 | 79.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 232,849 | 80.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 248,645 | 78.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 88,684 | 77.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 88,533 | 81.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 52,228 | 73.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 48,029 | 68.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 53,181 | 70.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 15,979 | 78.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66% | 13,814 | 85.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 66,282 | 76.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 18,475 | 77.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 15,996 | 69.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 7,995 | 88.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.58% | 7,909 | 75.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 1,750 | 81.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 2,773 | 60.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 4,957 | 77.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 20,308 | 77.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 26,620 | 77.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.70% | 4,529 | 74.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.86% | 2,471 | 66.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 4,663 | 89.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 40,523 | 80.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.56% | 4,225 | 57.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 6.00% | 3,852 | 72.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.16% | 438 | 90.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 6,967 | 78.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.51% | 215 | 100.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.67% | 450 | 37.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.95% | 4,633 | 76.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 1,108 | 78.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 8,480 | 69.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.45% | 2,925 | 46.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.56% | 6,148 | 74.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 2,449 | 83.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.00% | 350 | 89.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 633 | 75.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29% | 4,329 | 88.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.60% | 651 | 100.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 919 | 75.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.93% | 1,399 | 84.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11% | 966 | 78.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 4,841 | 86.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.70% | 268 | 75.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.00% | 7,518 | 85.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.49% | 286 | 86.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75% | 930 | 61.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 5,491 | 92.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15% | 1,283 | 76.9% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.54% | 208 | 100.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.68% | 1,516 | 90.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85% | 16,537 | 88.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.98% | 31,368 | 86.6% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37% | 897 | 94.1% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.13% | 8,460 | 79.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31% | 3,110 | 73.1% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.64% | 560 | 52.2% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30% | 791 | 100.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.98% | 488 | 51.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55% | 145 | 100.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79% | 262 | 100.0% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.46% | 428 | 65.5% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.31% | 64 | 100.0% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23% | 212 | 100.0% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.86% | 988 | 100.0% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.81% | 189 | 100.0% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.74% | 1,286 | 50.0% |