Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Female Poverty
11.9%
POVERTY | FEMALES
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,448,057 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.178 and weighted average of 11.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.36% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Immigrants from Czechoslovakia simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants from Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants from Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants from Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants from Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants from Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants from Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.022% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 18.1% | 34.9% |
| Range | 18.1% | 32.8% |
| Mean | 2.7% | 10.7% |
| Median | 1.8% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.87% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 6.1% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.022% | 130,946,311 | 14.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.073% | 39,419,897 | 12.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 11,221,197 | 11.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 5,209,777 | 10.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 3,100,384 | 10.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.30% | 1,517,285 | 9.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 1,263,015 | 10.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.41% | 613,737 | 8.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 438,835 | 11.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 375,939 | 9.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 280,430 | 13.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62% | 287,147 | 8.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 96,067 | 10.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 125,539 | 14.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 73,297 | 9.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 13,000 | 9.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.90% | 128,232 | 8.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 41,413 | 7.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 39,657 | 8.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 32,075 | 8.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 19,570 | 9.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 29,269 | 6.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 21,542 | 11.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.30% | 31,003 | 9.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 8,415 | 7.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 19,723 | 12.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.45% | 3,104 | 6.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.50% | 9,493 | 8.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.56% | 321 | 8.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 27,614 | 8.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 5,413 | 5.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 782 | 8.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 1,689 | 9.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 5,064 | 7.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 2.00% | 2,854 | 16.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.03% | 2,704 | 2.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.11% | 2,460 | 4.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.18% | 1,975 | 17.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 1,317 | 9.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.32% | 691 | 5.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.38% | 210 | 12.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 2,436 | 19.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.50% | 1,763 | 6.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 4,135 | 9.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66% | 828 | 6.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 1,426 | 34.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 3,664 | 6.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.12% | 642 | 5.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.17% | 6,019 | 16.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 417 | 7.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 1,272 | 3.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 115 | 19.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.39% | 296 | 17.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.48% | 223 | 11.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.58% | 1,289 | 5.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.58% | 197 | 6.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.84% | 2,002 | 5.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.42% | 1,636 | 12.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.11% | 225 | 20.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.14% | 86 | 7.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.43% | 83 | 7.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.54% | 346 | 27.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.96% | 146 | 32.0% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.13% | 364 | 3.0% |