Immigrants from Romania Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Romania
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Immigrants from Romania Female Poverty
12.0%
POVERTY | FEMALES
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Romania Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,918,121 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054 and weighted average of 12.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Romania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.13% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Romania and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Romania influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Immigrants from Romania simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Romania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Slovene (12.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (12.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Asian (11.9%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Croatia (12.0%, a difference of 0.54%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants from Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants from Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants from Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants from Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants from Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants from Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants from Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants from Romania Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Romania Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.030% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 14.5% | 31.2% |
| Range | 14.5% | 29.7% |
| Mean | 2.7% | 11.5% |
| Median | 2.0% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.00% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 6.4% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Romania Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.030% | 129,807,343 | 14.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.089% | 50,810,940 | 12.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.15% | 35,117,067 | 13.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 15,167,246 | 12.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28% | 7,230,791 | 10.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.34% | 5,104,256 | 10.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.40% | 3,613,030 | 11.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 2,239,643 | 10.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 1,759,971 | 10.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 1,532,035 | 10.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 768,163 | 9.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 624,238 | 8.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.78% | 690,550 | 11.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 293,064 | 9.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 512,063 | 10.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.97% | 271,838 | 8.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 114,945 | 12.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 132,567 | 7.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 77,806 | 13.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 189,735 | 11.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.27% | 50,767 | 8.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 181,360 | 9.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.39% | 51,700 | 5.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.46% | 54,250 | 9.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 36,802 | 17.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 6,667 | 15.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.65% | 11,390 | 4.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 7,232 | 7.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.76% | 66,164 | 9.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.85% | 7,828 | 12.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 93,713 | 14.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.98% | 63,866 | 6.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.02% | 65,890 | 16.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 11,056 | 1.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.15% | 41,134 | 9.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.21% | 11,062 | 8.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 523 | 22.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.36% | 2,199 | 17.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 27,951 | 7.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 14,652 | 14.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 1,125 | 2.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.65% | 1,814 | 14.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 1,048 | 2.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.93% | 852 | 3.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.94% | 26,939 | 14.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 1,194 | 21.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 1,003 | 21.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.33% | 3,064 | 17.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.52% | 426 | 10.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.59% | 390 | 15.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 2,812 | 2.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.95% | 1,899 | 3.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.01% | 673 | 2.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 5,555 | 13.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.31% | 116 | 21.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 69 | 26.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.52% | 177 | 10.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.59% | 676 | 31.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.85% | 515 | 26.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 98 | 22.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.55% | 412 | 1.6% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.10% | 1,885 | 1.5% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.23% | 1,668 | 5.2% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.49% | 214 | 9.2% |