Paraguayan vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income
COMPARE
Paraguayan
Chickasaw
Per Capita Income
Per Capita Income Comparison
Paraguayans
Chickasaw
$50,385
PER CAPITA INCOME
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
$36,475
PER CAPITA INCOME
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Paraguayan vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,089,637 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Paraguayans and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126 and weighted average of $50,385. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,726,791 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.505 and weighted average of $36,475, a difference of 38.1%.
Per Capita Income Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Paraguayan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | $20,486 | $10,758 |
| Maximum | $119,781 | $42,047 |
| Range | $99,295 | $31,289 |
| Mean | $52,548 | $28,009 |
| Median | $49,067 | $27,826 |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | $38,496 | $24,362 |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | $56,770 | $31,977 |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | $18,274 | $7,616 |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | $21,489 | $5,659 |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | $21,325 | $5,624 |
Similar Demographics by Per Capita Income
Demographics Similar to Paraguayans by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Paraguayans are Immigrants from Croatia ($50,417, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Netherlands ($50,458, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Belarus ($50,303, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka ($50,555, a difference of 0.34%), and New Zealander ($50,575, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional $50,914 |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional $50,906 |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional $50,810 |
| New Zealanders | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional $50,575 |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional $50,555 |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional $50,458 |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional $50,417 |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional $50,385 |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional $50,303 |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional $50,065 |
| Asians | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional $50,057 |
| South Africans | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional $50,044 |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional $49,983 |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional $49,894 |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional $49,893 |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Bahamian ($36,427, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa ($36,631, a difference of 0.43%), Ute ($36,651, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Honduras ($36,665, a difference of 0.52%), and Fijian ($36,690, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
| Inupiat | 0.1 /100 | #305 | Tragic $36,999 |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic $36,849 |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic $36,823 |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic $36,690 |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic $36,665 |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic $36,651 |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic $36,631 |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic $36,475 |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic $36,427 |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic $36,180 |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic $36,112 |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic $35,999 |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic $35,922 |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic $35,897 |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic $35,720 |