Immigrants from Iran vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Iran
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Iran
Chickasaw
9.9%
MALE POVERTY
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Iran vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 279,773,882 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iran and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.413 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 36.3%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Iran | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.33% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 52.3% | 33.0% |
| Range | 51.9% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 9.2% | 15.0% |
| Median | 7.8% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Iran by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Iran are Korean (9.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Moldova (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Cypriot (9.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Pakistan (9.9%, a difference of 0.42%), and Russian (9.9%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Iranians | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Czechs | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.2 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Russians | 99.2 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Cypriots | 99.2 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Turks | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 98.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 98.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |