Immigrants from Iran vs Chickasaw Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Immigrants from Iran
Chickasaw
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Immigrants from Iran
Chickasaw
8.5%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Iran vs Chickasaw Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 279,816,013 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iran and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.311 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,666,878 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 89.7%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Iran | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.52% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 23.3% | 51.4% |
| Range | 22.7% | 49.5% |
| Mean | 6.8% | 23.7% |
| Median | 6.7% | 21.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 18.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.1% | 27.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 9.0% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Iran by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Iran are Thai (8.6%, a difference of 1.0%), Immigrants from Israel (8.6%, a difference of 1.4%), Iranian (8.7%, a difference of 2.0%), Immigrants from China (8.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and Immigrants from India (8.3%, a difference of 2.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Pima (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and Colville (15.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |