Immigrants from Colombia vs Northern European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,949,835 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans within Immigrant from Colombia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.344. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Colombia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Northern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Colombia corresponds to an increase of 19.1 Northern Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.3% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 16.3%), median family income ($98,067 compared to $110,635, a difference of 12.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,658 compared to $64,658, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,714 compared to $51,678, a difference of 3.9%), median female earnings ($38,913 compared to $40,491, a difference of 4.1%), and median earnings ($45,550 compared to $48,887, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 37.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 36.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.47%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 0.61%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.5% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 20.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.1%), births to unmarried women (32.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and currently married (46.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.9%), family households (66.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 36.0%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 32.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 5.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 15.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 27.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 53.0%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.4%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.93%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 29.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 27.6%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.64%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.90%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.5%).