Immigrants from Belize vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,456,662 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Immigrant from Belize communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.529. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belize within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.756% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belize corresponds to an increase of 1,755.5 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 19.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,229 compared to $98,340, a difference of 12.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,141 compared to $93,661, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,056 compared to $39,376, a difference of 6.3%), per capita income ($38,614 compared to $41,495, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,223 compared to $55,543, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 41.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 38.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 7.3%), single male poverty (13.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and single mother poverty (31.4% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 35.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 29.8%), and female unemployment (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 22.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.8% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.3%), births to unmarried women (37.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 22.6%), and currently married (41.8% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (64.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 61.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 53.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 6.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 24.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 45.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 70.7%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 12.4%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 45.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 30.6%), and male disability (11.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 0.35%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.2%).