Hungarian vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Hungarian
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Hungarians
Chickasaw
13.8%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hungarian vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 413,693,148 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.354 and weighted average of 13.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 18.4%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hungarian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 4.0% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 67.9% |
| Range | 96.0% | 63.9% |
| Mean | 30.2% | 25.6% |
| Median | 15.5% | 23.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.9% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.3% | 31.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.5% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.8% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 28.4% | 12.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Hungarians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Swiss (13.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Guatemalan (13.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Guatemala (13.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Fijian (13.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Central America (13.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Spaniards | 0.4 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.4 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.3 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Guatemalans | 0.3 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Swiss | 0.3 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Hungarians | 0.3 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Fijians | 0.3 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.2 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.8% |
| West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Germans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |