Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Kiowa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,708,011 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.241. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Kiowa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 4.6 Kiowa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $74,776, a difference of 71.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($127,500 compared to $74,815, a difference of 70.4%), and median household income ($111,519 compared to $65,914, a difference of 69.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 8.1%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $44,733, a difference of 38.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $51,140, a difference of 39.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 96.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 92.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 89.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 15.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 40.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 44.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 38.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.77%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 22.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 83.0%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 52.3%), and single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.38%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and family households (66.1% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.21%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 107.9%), master's degree (20.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 88.8%), and doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 87.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.0%), 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.93%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 111.8%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 80.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 69.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 16.7%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 16.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 24.6%).