Luxembourger vs Kiowa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Kiowa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Kiowa

Excellent
Poor
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,045
SOCIAL INDEX
18.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
274th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Kiowa Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,951,116 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.937. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.179% in Kiowa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 179.3 Kiowa.
Luxembourger Integration in Kiowa Communities

Luxembourger vs Kiowa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $74,815, a difference of 38.4%), median family income ($106,183 compared to $80,885, a difference of 31.3%), and median household income ($86,418 compared to $65,914, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $44,733, a difference of 12.6%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 16.2%), and median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $34,074, a difference of 17.1%).
Luxembourger vs Kiowa Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerKiowa
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$35,102
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$80,885
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$65,914
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$39,232
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$45,094
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$34,074
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Tragic
$44,733
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$74,776
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$74,815
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Tragic
$51,140
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
23.6%

Luxembourger vs Kiowa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 71.4%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 69.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.3% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 66.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 14.2%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 24.3%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 31.4%).
Luxembourger vs Kiowa Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerKiowa
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
16.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
15.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
18.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
29.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
19.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
24.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
22.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
21.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
23.7%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
18.3%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
26.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
22.5%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
35.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Fair
12.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
14.9%

Luxembourger vs Kiowa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 67.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 44.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Luxembourger vs Kiowa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerKiowa
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
25.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%

Luxembourger vs Kiowa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 21.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 7.9%).
Luxembourger vs Kiowa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerKiowa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
62.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Excellent
37.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Tragic
73.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
78.3%

Luxembourger vs Kiowa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 46.6%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 28.4%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.89%), family households (63.3% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.27, a difference of 5.4%).
Luxembourger vs Kiowa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerKiowa
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
61.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Fair
27.3%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
42.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
43.1%

Luxembourger vs Kiowa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 115.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 9.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 7.0%).
Luxembourger vs Kiowa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerKiowa
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
11.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
88.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Average
19.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Fair
6.2%

Luxembourger vs Kiowa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 49.7%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 41.7%), and bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%).
Luxembourger vs Kiowa Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerKiowa
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
88.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
57.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
51.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
36.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
10.8%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Luxembourger vs Kiowa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 67.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 64.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 12.1%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 21.0%).
Luxembourger vs Kiowa Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerKiowa
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.6%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
15.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
8.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
17.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
32.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
54.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.3%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.0%