Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,730,746 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within Cheyenne communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.089. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cheyenne within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cheyenne corresponds to a decrease of 8.0 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 20.6%), median household income ($66,974 compared to $80,373, a difference of 20.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($76,362 compared to $91,347, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,096 compared to $55,598, a difference of 2.8%), median male earnings ($46,062 compared to $51,376, a difference of 11.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,152 compared to $89,748, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 48.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (28.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 46.1%), and single female poverty (30.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.84%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (10.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 100.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (16.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 79.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 25.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.6% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.9%), births to unmarried women (41.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (42.2% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 0.87%), family households (63.2% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple households (42.3% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 110.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 101.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 70.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 15.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 34.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 70.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 27.6%), master's degree (11.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 25.8%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (82.7% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.15%), college, under 1 year (60.6% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and 12th grade, no diploma (89.6% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 59.5%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 36.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.2%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.1%).