Alaskan Athabascan vs Macedonian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Macedonian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Macedonians
3.1%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Macedonian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,813,116 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,627,302 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.108 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 57.8%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Macedonian |
| Minimum | 0.32% | 0.17% |
| Maximum | 16.7% | 4.5% |
| Range | 16.4% | 4.4% |
| Mean | 4.9% | 1.9% |
| Median | 3.5% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 1.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 0.79% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 0.73% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 0.73% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 0.93%), Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Macedonians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Belarus (2.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Laotian (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Serbia (2.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Jordanian (2.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Somali (2.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Afghans | 99.5 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Laotians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Jordanians | 99.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Argentineans | 99.1 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.0% |