Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from Ireland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 239,996,691 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.055. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Ireland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Immigrants from Ireland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,741 compared to $56,584, a difference of 13.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $120,333, a difference of 8.6%), and median family income ($118,291 compared to $127,584, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.28%), householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $57,075, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $68,495, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 19.0%), single father poverty (14.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 15.7%), and family poverty (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.3%), single mother poverty (26.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 13.2%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.0%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.30%), births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and married-couple households (49.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 26.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 34.1%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.4%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.66%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.66%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 16.7%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 10.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.62%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.5%).