Immigrants from Brazil vs Immigrants from Ireland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,154,647 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland within Immigrant from Brazil communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.187. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Brazil within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from Ireland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Brazil corresponds to a decrease of 6.8 Immigrants from Ireland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($100,534 compared to $120,333, a difference of 19.7%), per capita income ($48,164 compared to $56,584, a difference of 17.5%), and median family income ($109,418 compared to $127,584, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.44%), householder income under 25 years ($54,487 compared to $57,075, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,364 compared to $68,495, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 21.9%), family poverty (8.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.2%), single male poverty (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.0%), and births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.59%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 27.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.6%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 17.7%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.1%), disability (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.3%).