Choctaw vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
White/Caucasian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Whites/Caucasians

Fair
Average
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,140
SOCIAL INDEX
48.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
185th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

White/Caucasian Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,740,853 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.851. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.688% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 688.1 Whites/Caucasians.
Choctaw Integration in White/Caucasian Communities

Choctaw vs White/Caucasian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $98,091, a difference of 19.2%), median family income ($84,835 compared to $99,800, a difference of 17.6%), and median household income ($69,947 compared to $82,029, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.3%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $50,336, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $58,847, a difference of 10.9%).
Choctaw vs White/Caucasian Income
Income MetricChoctawWhite/Caucasian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Poor
$42,180
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Poor
$99,800
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Poor
$82,029
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Poor
$45,197
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Fair
$53,925
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Tragic
$37,531
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Tragic
$50,336
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Poor
$91,668
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Fair
$98,091
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Tragic
$58,847
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Tragic
28.5%

Choctaw vs White/Caucasian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 32.6%), married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 30.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.6%), single father poverty (20.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.1%).
Choctaw vs White/Caucasian Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawWhite/Caucasian
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Average
11.1%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Poor
18.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Average
16.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Average
16.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Average
16.6%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
18.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Tragic
31.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Excellent
11.1%

Choctaw vs White/Caucasian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.4%).
Choctaw vs White/Caucasian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawWhite/Caucasian
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Poor
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
8.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
5.3%

Choctaw vs White/Caucasian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.5%).
Choctaw vs White/Caucasian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawWhite/Caucasian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Tragic
63.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Tragic
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
76.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Tragic
81.9%

Choctaw vs White/Caucasian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 15.3%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.5%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.32%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.2%).
Choctaw vs White/Caucasian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawWhite/Caucasian
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
65.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Exceptional
48.6%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Exceptional
48.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Poor
33.3%

Choctaw vs White/Caucasian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.92%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 2.6%).
Choctaw vs White/Caucasian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawWhite/Caucasian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
7.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Exceptional
93.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Exceptional
60.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.4%

Choctaw vs White/Caucasian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 26.2%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 25.3%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%).
Choctaw vs White/Caucasian Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawWhite/Caucasian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
93.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Exceptional
91.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Exceptional
90.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Good
86.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Poor
64.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Tragic
57.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Tragic
44.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Tragic
35.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
13.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Fair
1.8%

Choctaw vs White/Caucasian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 38.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 30.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.6%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.4%).
Choctaw vs White/Caucasian Disability
Disability MetricChoctawWhite/Caucasian
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
13.0%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Average
47.3%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.6%