Immigrants from Central America vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 536,563,065 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.145% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to an increase of 144.9 Whites/Caucasians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,974 compared to $42,180, a difference of 20.6%), median male earnings ($45,538 compared to $53,925, a difference of 18.4%), and median family income ($85,050 compared to $99,800, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $50,336, a difference of 1.4%), householder income over 65 years ($53,420 compared to $58,847, a difference of 10.2%), and median household income ($74,217 compared to $82,029, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 54.1%), family poverty (12.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 38.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 2.8%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and single mother poverty (33.6% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.1%), and unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 18.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 31.8%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.5%), and family households with children (31.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.4%), family households (68.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and married-couple households (45.7% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 26.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 2.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 121.7%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 48.1%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 35.3%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 24.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.0%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.5%).