Choctaw vs Tsimshian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Tsimshian

Fair
Average
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tsimshian Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,074,300 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 14.3 Tsimshian.
Choctaw Integration in Tsimshian Communities

Choctaw vs Tsimshian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $97,809, a difference of 25.1%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $54,649, a difference of 20.2%), and median family income ($84,835 compared to $101,543, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $48,836, a difference of 2.3%), median earnings ($40,270 compared to $43,695, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $58,202, a difference of 9.7%).
Choctaw vs Tsimshian Income
Income MetricChoctawTsimshian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Tragic
$40,344
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Fair
$101,543
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Fair
$83,346
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Tragic
$43,695
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Tragic
$48,836
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Average
$39,530
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Exceptional
$54,649
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Excellent
$97,809
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Poor
$96,783
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Tragic
$58,202
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Exceptional
23.9%

Choctaw vs Tsimshian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (21.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 84.3%), single father poverty (20.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 63.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 5.3%), married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and male poverty (14.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 12.4%).
Choctaw vs Tsimshian Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawTsimshian
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
13.0%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Average
16.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
11.1%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Exceptional
26.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
15.7%

Choctaw vs Tsimshian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 114.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 69.3%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.5%).
Choctaw vs Tsimshian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawTsimshian
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
8.5%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
16.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
18.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Tragic
10.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
11.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Poor
5.6%

Choctaw vs Tsimshian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.94%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 3.4%).
Choctaw vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawTsimshian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Tragic
64.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Excellent
37.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Exceptional
88.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Tragic
77.4%

Choctaw vs Tsimshian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.2%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 14.3%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (46.3% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households (64.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.4%).
Choctaw vs Tsimshian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawTsimshian
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Exceptional
47.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
13.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Tragic
42.2%

Choctaw vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 20.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.91%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.9%).
Choctaw vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawTsimshian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Fair
6.2%

Choctaw vs Tsimshian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in college, 1 year or more (52.3% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 10.7%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 9.4%), and college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.61%).
Choctaw vs Tsimshian Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawTsimshian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
99.0%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Exceptional
97.0%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Poor
64.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Poor
57.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.4%

Choctaw vs Tsimshian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (15.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 3.0%).
Choctaw vs Tsimshian Disability
Disability MetricChoctawTsimshian
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
16.1%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
15.6%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
16.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
2.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
32.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Tragic
59.2%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
4.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
8.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.6%