Uruguayan vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Uruguayans
Tsimshian
4,949
SOCIAL INDEX
47.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
188th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Uruguayan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 9,391,239 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.055% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 55.5 Tsimshian.
Uruguayan vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $48,836, a difference of 9.9%), per capita income ($44,318 compared to $40,344, a difference of 9.9%), and median earnings ($46,190 compared to $43,695, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,228 compared to $39,530, a difference of 0.77%), median family income ($100,656 compared to $101,543, a difference of 0.88%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $58,202, a difference of 1.5%).
Income Metric | Uruguayan | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,318 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Fair $100,656 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,691 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,190 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Fair $53,680 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,228 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,465 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $93,631 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,660 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,090 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.2% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Uruguayan vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (16.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 41.0%), receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 33.0%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (16.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.060%), female poverty (13.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and family poverty (9.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.2%).
Poverty Metric | Uruguayan | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Average 12.4% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Fair 9.1% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Fair 13.6% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.8% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.3% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 17.0% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.1% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.2% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.2% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.3% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.8% | Tragic 15.7% |
Uruguayan vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 166.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 76.9%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 66.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Uruguayan | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Poor 5.6% |
Uruguayan vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Uruguayan | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.9% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.6% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.9% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Excellent 83.1% | Tragic 77.4% |
Uruguayan vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 27.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.7%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.47%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (64.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Uruguayan | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Poor 45.5% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.6% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.6% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.1% | Tragic 42.2% |
Uruguayan vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 31.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 7.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Uruguayan | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.3% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.8% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.7% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.6% | Fair 6.2% |
Uruguayan vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 45.6%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 35.1%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (64.2% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Uruguayan | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.9% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.4% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.2% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 85.0% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.2% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.8% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.4% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.4% |
Uruguayan vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 97.8%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 69.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 63.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.6%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.4%).
Disability Metric | Uruguayan | Tsimshian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Average 5.6% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |