Crow vs Tongan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,631,002 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.835. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in Tongans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 50.2 Tongans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $108,643, a difference of 46.3%), median household income ($63,681 compared to $93,076, a difference of 46.2%), and wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $38,288, a difference of 8.6%), median earnings ($38,707 compared to $45,665, a difference of 18.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $56,972, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 147.9%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 122.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 118.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 38.6%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 45.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 52.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 278.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 266.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 255.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 37.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 37.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 42.2%), single father households (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 39.5%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 69.6%, a difference of 6.7%), average family size (3.82 compared to 3.49, a difference of 9.5%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 53.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 29.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 38.8%), bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 23.5%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.060%), 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.76%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 43.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 39.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.4%), disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.0%).