Luxembourger vs Tongan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tongan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Tongans

Excellent
Good
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,132
SOCIAL INDEX
68.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
130th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tongan Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,754,473 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.851. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.213% in Tongans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 213.3 Tongans.
Luxembourger Integration in Tongan Communities

Luxembourger vs Tongan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $56,972, a difference of 13.1%), householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $68,235, a difference of 11.9%), and per capita income ($45,663 compared to $41,693, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.13%), median family income ($106,183 compared to $105,967, a difference of 0.20%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $99,604, a difference of 2.4%).
Luxembourger vs Tongan Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerTongan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$41,693
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Excellent
$105,967
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Exceptional
$93,076
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Fair
$45,665
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Fair
$53,218
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$38,288
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Exceptional
$56,972
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Exceptional
$99,604
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Exceptional
$108,643
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Exceptional
$68,235
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
27.5%

Luxembourger vs Tongan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 40.0%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 27.8%), and married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.73%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and male poverty (9.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.1%).
Luxembourger vs Tongan Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerTongan
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
17.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
14.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
13.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
13.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Exceptional
26.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.7%

Luxembourger vs Tongan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 35.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.2%).
Luxembourger vs Tongan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerTongan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
15.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
5.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
6.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%

Luxembourger vs Tongan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 2.0%).
Luxembourger vs Tongan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerTongan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
67.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
41.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Exceptional
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Excellent
83.1%

Luxembourger vs Tongan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.0% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 15.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.9%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.49, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.3% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.9%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.7%).
Luxembourger vs Tongan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerTongan
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
69.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
31.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
51.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Exceptional
48.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Exceptional
28.4%

Luxembourger vs Tongan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 51.6%), no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 33.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 27.1%).
Luxembourger vs Tongan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerTongan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
7.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
92.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
63.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
26.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
10.0%

Luxembourger vs Tongan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 43.3%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 24.2%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.79%).
Luxembourger vs Tongan Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerTongan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
95.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
95.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Poor
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Poor
90.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Fair
64.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Poor
57.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
34.3%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
12.5%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Poor
1.7%

Luxembourger vs Tongan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 11.2%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.68%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.81%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Luxembourger vs Tongan Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerTongan
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Good
11.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Fair
23.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
48.3%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%