Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Swiss Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Swiss
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Swiss

Fair
Good
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,517
SOCIAL INDEX
72.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
114th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Swiss Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,049,860 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.393. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 18.2 Swiss.
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Swiss Communities

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Swiss Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 31.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $103,071, a difference of 12.8%), and median male earnings ($50,298 compared to $55,731, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $37,904, a difference of 0.33%), median earnings ($43,998 compared to $46,315, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $51,493, a difference of 5.6%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Swiss Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarSwiss
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,827
Good
$44,076
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,472
Good
$104,396
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,682
Average
$85,681
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,998
Average
$46,315
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,298
Good
$55,731
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,028
Tragic
$37,904
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,749
Poor
$51,493
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,736
Good
$95,511
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,385
Good
$103,071
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,114
Good
$61,621
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Tragic
30.0%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Swiss Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 40.5%), family poverty (10.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 36.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 2.9%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 5.0%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Swiss Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarSwiss
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Families
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Good
13.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
16.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
14.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Fair
21.4%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.3%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.7%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Swiss Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Swiss Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarSwiss
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
15.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Swiss Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Swiss Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarSwiss
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Tragic
64.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Exceptional
43.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Exceptional
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Poor
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Average
82.8%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Swiss Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.2%), married-couple households (43.4% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 15.1%), and currently married (44.3% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (62.6% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 4.2%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Swiss Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarSwiss
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
49.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.3%
Exceptional
49.7%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.9%
Excellent
30.5%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Swiss Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 32.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 24.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 13.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 22.2%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Swiss Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarSwiss
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
61.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.8%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Swiss Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 105.8%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Swiss Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarSwiss
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.7%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
87.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.5%
Average
65.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Average
59.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.7%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Fair
37.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.5%
Average
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Excellent
2.0%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Swiss Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.8%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 20.6%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.12%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Swiss Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarSwiss
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Poor
11.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Good
22.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.4%