Bhutanese vs Swiss Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 402,010,885 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.446. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 7.7 Swiss.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $61,621, a difference of 17.3%), median household income ($100,151 compared to $85,681, a difference of 16.9%), and median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $37,904, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($61,759 compared to $55,731, a difference of 10.8%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $51,493, a difference of 10.8%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 24.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 20.9%), and single female poverty (17.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 18.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 9.3%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.98%), married-couple households (49.3% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 11.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.56%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.5%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 17.9%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.020%), 10th grade (94.9% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 39.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.62%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.72%), and disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.0%).