Choctaw vs Swiss Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 243,740,477 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.385. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 14.7 Swiss.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $103,071, a difference of 25.3%), median family income ($84,835 compared to $104,396, a difference of 23.1%), and median household income ($69,947 compared to $85,681, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 6.5%), median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $37,904, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $51,493, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 50.7%), married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 46.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 17.0%), single father poverty (20.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 20.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 24.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.1%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 21.0%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.54%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.15, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 2.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.51%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.44%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 0.020%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 38.7%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 36.4%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 52.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 41.4%), and ambulatory disability (8.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.5%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 14.8%).