Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Jordanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,411,853 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jordanians within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Jordanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 3.2 Jordanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $109,376, a difference of 19.7%), wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 17.3%), and median household income ($78,682 compared to $91,794, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $51,796, a difference of 6.2%), median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $41,464, a difference of 9.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $64,313, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 32.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 30.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (20.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.10%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.4%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 15.3%), and married-couple households (43.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (62.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 22.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 59.5%), master's degree (13.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 22.2%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 21.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.5%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.35%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 4.0%).