Choctaw vs Jordanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Jordanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Jordanians

Fair
Exceptional
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,589
SOCIAL INDEX
93.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
11th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Jordanian Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,426,409 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.708. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.070% in Jordanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 70.1 Jordanians.
Choctaw Integration in Jordanian Communities

Choctaw vs Jordanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $109,376, a difference of 32.9%), median household income ($69,947 compared to $91,794, a difference of 31.2%), and median family income ($84,835 compared to $109,865, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 5.0%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $51,796, a difference of 14.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $64,313, a difference of 21.2%).
Choctaw vs Jordanian Income
Income MetricChoctawJordanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Excellent
$45,605
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Exceptional
$109,865
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Exceptional
$91,794
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Exceptional
$49,632
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Exceptional
$58,500
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Exceptional
$41,464
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Fair
$51,796
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Exceptional
$99,186
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Exceptional
$109,376
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Exceptional
$64,313
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Tragic
26.8%

Choctaw vs Jordanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 50.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 49.6%), and single female poverty (27.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and single father poverty (20.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 28.7%).
Choctaw vs Jordanian Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawJordanian
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Exceptional
18.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Exceptional
26.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.2%

Choctaw vs Jordanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 33.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.3%).
Choctaw vs Jordanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawJordanian
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Average
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.3%

Choctaw vs Jordanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Choctaw vs Jordanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawJordanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Fair
36.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Exceptional
83.4%

Choctaw vs Jordanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 29.3%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.9%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.89%), family households (64.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 3.2%).
Choctaw vs Jordanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawJordanian
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
65.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
29.0%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Exceptional
48.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Exceptional
28.5%

Choctaw vs Jordanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 14.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.90%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 8.1%).
Choctaw vs Jordanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawJordanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Exceptional
57.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Excellent
6.6%

Choctaw vs Jordanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 49.7%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 46.8%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.2% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.070%), 7th grade (96.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and 9th grade (95.1% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.21%).
Choctaw vs Jordanian Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawJordanian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Excellent
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Excellent
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Exceptional
95.3%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Exceptional
92.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Exceptional
90.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
87.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Exceptional
68.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Exceptional
49.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
16.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Excellent
4.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.0%

Choctaw vs Jordanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 66.7%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 64.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 61.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 9.9%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 14.4%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.0%).
Choctaw vs Jordanian Disability
Disability MetricChoctawJordanian
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
22.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.3%