German vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,485,557 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.304. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Germans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Germans corresponds to a decrease of 2.8 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between German and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 50.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,224 compared to $91,347, a difference of 9.7%), and median family income ($102,254 compared to $93,988, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,935 compared to $45,729, a difference of 0.45%), householder income under 25 years ($50,804 compared to $52,437, a difference of 3.2%), and median household income ($83,358 compared to $80,373, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between German and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 62.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 57.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 57.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 1.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between German and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 47.3%), male unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 42.6%), and unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between German and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 46.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.6% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between German and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 32.2%), married-couple households (49.2% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 19.3%), and currently married (49.6% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.43%), divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between German and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 269.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 81.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 70.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 22.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.6% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 52.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 70.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between German and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 94.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 20.8%), and college, under 1 year (65.6% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (14.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.75%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between German and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 52.1%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 50.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.9%).