Crow vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,276,807 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.421% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 421.1 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $41,476, a difference of 30.7%), median household income ($63,681 compared to $80,373, a difference of 26.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,337 compared to $89,748, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $52,437, a difference of 11.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $55,598, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 80.0%), single father poverty (30.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 79.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (33.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 68.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 217.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 216.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 181.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 27.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 11.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 62.3%), divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 15.3%), and average family size (3.82 compared to 3.33, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (41.4% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 0.35%), family households (65.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 123.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 89.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 68.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 16.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 38.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 68.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 60.8%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 32.8%), and bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.10%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and college, under 1 year (60.2% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 67.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 40.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.3%), female disability (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.6%).