Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,449,612 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within Bangladeshi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.143. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bangladeshis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bangladeshis corresponds to an increase of 1.8 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,897 compared to $41,476, a difference of 15.5%), wage/income gap (22.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.6%), and median female earnings ($35,960 compared to $40,895, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,719 compared to $55,598, a difference of 1.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,402 compared to $91,347, a difference of 5.7%), and median family income ($88,358 compared to $93,988, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 31.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 26.0%), and single female poverty (24.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.50%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 36.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 28.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 40.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.8%), family households with children (30.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and single mother households (8.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.13%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.33, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 184.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 83.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 63.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 19.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 45.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 63.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 34.8%), no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 34.3%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (90.9% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.080%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and 9th grade (93.4% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 27.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.6%), disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.0%).