Crow vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Crow
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Lithuania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaSerbiaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Crow

Immigrants from Lithuania

Fair
Exceptional
2,555
SOCIAL INDEX
23.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
251st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,656
SOCIAL INDEX
94.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
10th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Lithuania Integration in Crow Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,146,881 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.936. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.459% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 459.4 Immigrants from Lithuania.
Crow Integration in Immigrants from Lithuania Communities

Crow vs Immigrants from Lithuania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $51,361, a difference of 61.9%), median family income ($76,605 compared to $118,053, a difference of 54.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $114,336, a difference of 54.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $55,028, a difference of 17.1%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $43,317, a difference of 22.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $66,087, a difference of 34.2%).
Crow vs Immigrants from Lithuania Income
Income MetricCrowImmigrants from Lithuania
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$31,729
Exceptional
$51,361
Median Family Income
Tragic
$76,605
Exceptional
$118,053
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,681
Exceptional
$96,836
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,707
Exceptional
$52,769
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,434
Exceptional
$63,346
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,266
Exceptional
$43,317
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,012
Exceptional
$55,028
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$71,337
Exceptional
$108,149
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$74,257
Exceptional
$114,336
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,234
Exceptional
$66,087
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
28.6%

Crow vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (16.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 123.1%), married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 121.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 120.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 45.2%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 45.2%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 53.2%).
Crow vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty
Poverty MetricCrowImmigrants from Lithuania
Poverty
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
10.3%
Families
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
33.2%
Exceptional
17.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
11.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
14.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
26.0%
Exceptional
12.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
13.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
26.4%
Exceptional
13.1%
Single Males
Tragic
23.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Single Females
Tragic
32.4%
Exceptional
17.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
25.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
9.2%

Crow vs Immigrants from Lithuania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 256.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 235.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 233.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.0%).
Crow vs Immigrants from Lithuania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCrowImmigrants from Lithuania
Unemployment
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
10.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
20.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
26.2%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
18.7%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
10.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
13.7%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
5.9%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
14.6%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.2%

Crow vs Immigrants from Lithuania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 11.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 7.1%).
Crow vs Immigrants from Lithuania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCrowImmigrants from Lithuania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.8%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.3%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.5%
Excellent
37.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.9%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
78.6%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
75.9%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
76.5%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.3%
Exceptional
83.9%

Crow vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 86.4%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 45.5%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.1%), family households (65.3% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 17.5%).
Crow vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCrowImmigrants from Lithuania
Family Households
Exceptional
65.3%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.4%
Exceptional
48.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.82
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
40.4%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.4%
Exceptional
27.7%

Crow vs Immigrants from Lithuania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 38.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 21.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 0.15%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.4%).
Crow vs Immigrants from Lithuania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCrowImmigrants from Lithuania
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.3%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.7%
Good
55.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.5%
Tragic
18.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
5.6%

Crow vs Immigrants from Lithuania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 76.5%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 73.9%), and bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 60.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.25%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and nursery school (99.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Crow vs Immigrants from Lithuania Education Level
Education Level MetricCrowImmigrants from Lithuania
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
99.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
99.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
99.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
99.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
99.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
99.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
99.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
99.4%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
99.1%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Exceptional
93.1%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Exceptional
70.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.5%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.6%
Exceptional
52.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
44.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
5.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.2%

Crow vs Immigrants from Lithuania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 52.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 42.8%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 8.6%).
Crow vs Immigrants from Lithuania Disability
Disability MetricCrowImmigrants from Lithuania
Disability
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
9.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.9%
Exceptional
20.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.6%
Exceptional
44.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Fair
17.3%
Exceptional
16.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%