Japanese vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,945,273 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.475. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to a decrease of 6.8 Immigrants from Lithuania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,870 compared to $51,361, a difference of 28.8%), median male earnings ($51,473 compared to $63,346, a difference of 23.1%), and median family income ($97,288 compared to $118,053, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,365 compared to $55,028, a difference of 5.1%), median female earnings ($38,528 compared to $43,317, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,919 compared to $66,087, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 52.4%), family poverty (9.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 36.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.44%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.6%), female unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.72%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 46.0%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 41.0%), and births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.2%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.15, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 36.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 18.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.41%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 98.1%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 57.1%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 28.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 25.2%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.5%).