Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Lithuania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Immigrants from Lithuania

Exceptional
Exceptional
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,656
SOCIAL INDEX
94.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
10th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Lithuania Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,505,153 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.645. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.293% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 292.7 Immigrants from Lithuania.
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Immigrants from Lithuania Communities

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Lithuania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 12.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $108,149, a difference of 10.5%), and median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $63,346, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $66,087, a difference of 3.8%), median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $43,317, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $55,028, a difference of 6.0%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Lithuania Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweImmigrants from Lithuania
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,394
Exceptional
$51,361
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,830
Exceptional
$118,053
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,496
Exceptional
$96,836
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,913
Exceptional
$52,769
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,352
Exceptional
$63,346
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,527
Exceptional
$43,317
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,914
Exceptional
$55,028
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,880
Exceptional
$108,149
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$104,992
Exceptional
$114,336
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,643
Exceptional
$66,087
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.3%
Tragic
28.6%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 16.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 16.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.62%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.3%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweImmigrants from Lithuania
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Exceptional
17.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.8%
Exceptional
14.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
12.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
13.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
13.1%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Exceptional
17.8%
Single Fathers
Good
16.1%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
25.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.2%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Lithuania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.68%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.81%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Lithuania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweImmigrants from Lithuania
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.0%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Lithuania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.33%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Lithuania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweImmigrants from Lithuania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.8%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Excellent
37.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
83.9%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.9%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.64%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.9%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweImmigrants from Lithuania
Family Households
Tragic
63.5%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Exceptional
48.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Average
46.7%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Exceptional
27.7%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Lithuania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 0.45%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.040%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.35%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 0.45%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Lithuania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweImmigrants from Lithuania
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.6%
Good
55.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Tragic
18.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Tragic
5.6%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Lithuania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 10.4%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.16%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.16%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Lithuania Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweImmigrants from Lithuania
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.4%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Exceptional
93.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.3%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.9%
Exceptional
70.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.3%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.5%
Exceptional
52.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.6%
Exceptional
44.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.4%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Lithuania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 11.1%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.080%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.77%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.99%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Lithuania Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweImmigrants from Lithuania
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
9.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Exceptional
20.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.2%
Exceptional
44.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Good
3.0%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Exceptional
16.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%