Luxembourger vs Apache Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,942,364 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Apache within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.118. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Apache. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 14.3 Apache.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Apache communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $34,886, a difference of 30.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $82,184, a difference of 26.0%), and median family income ($106,183 compared to $84,451, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $49,395, a difference of 2.0%), householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $54,668, a difference of 11.5%), and wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Apache communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 130.8%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 104.2%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 100.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 26.1%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 28.3%), and single female poverty (20.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 35.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Apache communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 95.1%), male unemployment (4.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 89.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 85.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Apache communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 27.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Apache communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 41.8%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 35.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 5.1%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Apache communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 105.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Apache communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 40.6%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 40.0%), and associate's degree (48.9% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Apache communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 54.3%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 54.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 13.7%), female disability (11.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 18.6%), and disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 19.6%).