Bhutanese vs Apache Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,327,860 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Apache within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.116. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Apache. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 3.1 Apache.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Apache communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $82,184, a difference of 43.3%), per capita income ($49,894 compared to $34,886, a difference of 43.0%), and median family income ($119,800 compared to $84,451, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 9.9%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $49,395, a difference of 15.5%), and median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $34,895, a difference of 25.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Apache communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 118.6%), family poverty (7.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 109.2%), and receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 98.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (25.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 42.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 44.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 44.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Apache communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 92.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 83.6%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 74.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Apache communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Apache communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 49.3%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 43.0%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.46, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Apache communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 26.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Apache communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 56.7%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 53.4%), and bachelor's degree (42.7% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.19%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Apache communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 73.8%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 52.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 12.4%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 13.8%).