Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Apache Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Apache
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Apache

Fair
Poor
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,423
SOCIAL INDEX
11.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
309th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Apache Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,592,110 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Apache within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.010. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Apache. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 0.5 Apache.
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Apache Communities

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Apache Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Apache communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,827 compared to $34,886, a difference of 14.2%), median family income ($94,472 compared to $84,451, a difference of 11.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $82,184, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $49,395, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $54,668, a difference of 4.5%), and wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 7.5%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Apache Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarApache
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,827
Tragic
$34,886
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,472
Tragic
$84,451
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,682
Tragic
$70,927
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,998
Tragic
$40,388
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,298
Tragic
$46,429
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,028
Tragic
$34,895
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,749
Tragic
$49,395
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,736
Tragic
$80,260
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,385
Tragic
$82,184
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,114
Tragic
$54,668
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Exceptional
24.5%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Apache Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Apache communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 64.4%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 48.7%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 19.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 21.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 22.0%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Apache Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarApache
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
18.4%
Families
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
14.7%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
17.7%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
19.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
26.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
20.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
25.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
23.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
24.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
23.8%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Tragic
27.7%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
24.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
36.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
9.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.3%
Tragic
13.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Tragic
15.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
18.3%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Apache Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Apache communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 82.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 67.9%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 65.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 8.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.9%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Apache Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarApache
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
7.4%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
8.6%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
18.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
9.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
12.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
7.9%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Apache Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Apache communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 6.9%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Apache Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarApache
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Tragic
60.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Poor
35.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Tragic
72.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Tragic
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Tragic
77.1%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Apache Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Apache communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 21.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.0%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.4% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (44.3% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 3.5%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Apache Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarApache
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
66.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
29.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.4%
Tragic
43.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Exceptional
3.46
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.3%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.9%
Tragic
39.9%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Apache Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Apache communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.61%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.8%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Apache Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarApache
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Poor
89.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Fair
55.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Exceptional
21.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.4%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Apache Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Apache communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 51.7%), bachelor's degree (35.5% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 25.5%), and master's degree (13.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (90.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.060%), 10th grade (91.8% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.83%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Apache Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarApache
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Average
97.4%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Poor
95.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Tragic
92.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Tragic
90.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Tragic
87.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.7%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
80.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.5%
Tragic
58.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Tragic
51.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
36.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Tragic
28.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
11.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Apache Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Apache communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 80.3%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 39.3%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.1%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 10.4%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Apache Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarApache
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
13.9%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
14.0%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
13.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
2.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Tragic
29.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Tragic
53.6%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
3.0%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
18.6%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
7.4%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.7%