Immigrants from Congo vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Congo
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Congo
Iroquois
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,003,989 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.215. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 57.7 Iroquois.
Immigrants from Congo vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $83,682, a difference of 15.9%), wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 15.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $87,255, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($51,393 compared to $53,737, a difference of 4.6%), median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $36,408, a difference of 6.1%), and median earnings ($39,169 compared to $42,430, a difference of 8.3%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,720 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,216 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $66,768 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,169 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $44,204 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,317 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $43,266 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $72,178 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $77,850 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,393 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.7% | Excellent 25.1% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 15.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (22.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 14.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.7%), single female poverty (25.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and single mother poverty (33.8% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 3.1%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Iroquois |
Poverty | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Tragic 17.4% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.6% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 22.5% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 22.4% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.8% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.1% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 38.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.7% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 80.6% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 16.6%), married-couple households (39.0% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 12.1%), and currently married (41.1% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.3%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 3.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Iroquois |
Family Households | Tragic 59.2% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.3% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 39.0% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.1% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.8% | Tragic 38.2% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 14.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.90%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 8.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.0% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.1% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.0% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.2% | Good 6.5% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.9%), high school diploma (87.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and associate's degree (41.8% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.58%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.4% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.9% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.0% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.0% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.7% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.6% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.8% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.6% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.6% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 36.1%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 27.4%), and male disability (11.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.60%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 7.8%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Iroquois |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.7% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.2% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |