Choctaw vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Choctaw
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Choctaw
Iroquois
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Choctaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,476,019 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 1.7 Iroquois.
Choctaw vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 12.2%), per capita income ($35,999 compared to $39,104, a difference of 8.6%), and median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $36,408, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $53,737, a difference of 1.3%), median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $49,374, a difference of 3.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $47,380, a difference of 4.3%).
Income Metric | Choctaw | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,999 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $84,835 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $69,947 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,270 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,729 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,775 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,450 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $78,168 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,287 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,060 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.1% | Excellent 25.1% |
Choctaw vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (17.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 17.2%), single father poverty (20.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 16.9%), and married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.43%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 3.5%).
Poverty Metric | Choctaw | Iroquois |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.3% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.5% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.3% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.4% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.3% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Choctaw vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.0%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.93%).
Unemployment Metric | Choctaw | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.0% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Choctaw vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Choctaw | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.5% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.4% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.5% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.2% | Tragic 80.6% |
Choctaw vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 9.8%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Choctaw | Iroquois |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.3% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.9% | Tragic 38.2% |
Choctaw vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 38.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 18.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Choctaw | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.2% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.3% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Good 6.5% |
Choctaw vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 16.9%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 14.5%), and associate's degree (37.8% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.050%), 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.070%).
Education Level Metric | Choctaw | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.1% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.8% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.8% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.3% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.8% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.4% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.6% |
Choctaw vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 28.8%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.4%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.33%), cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 8.8%).
Disability Metric | Choctaw | Iroquois |
Disability | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.7% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.7% |