Shoshone vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,468,316 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Shoshone communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.007. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Shoshone within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Shoshone corresponds to an increase of 0.4 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,072 compared to $39,104, a difference of 5.5%), median female earnings ($34,677 compared to $36,408, a difference of 5.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,588 compared to $87,255, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,681 compared to $53,737, a difference of 0.10%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,062 compared to $83,682, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (22.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 29.2%), single male poverty (16.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 15.1%), and married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (19.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.87%), poverty (14.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and female poverty (15.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (7.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 52.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 50.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.3% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.3% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 9.2%), births to unmarried women (35.3% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.16, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.9% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 0.37%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.69%), and currently married (44.0% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 36.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 28.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.35%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 16.2%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 15.4%), and bachelor's degree (29.3% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 22.9%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.76%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.5%).